Re: open office collaboration

Helge Hess <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
[email protected] wrote:
> Here's my 2 cents:
> - OOo doesn't store versions, it stores changes; this somewhat
>   supports collaboration, but it's best for sequential, not
>   parallel work

This also matches the current OGo storage. Checkout a document, edit, 
check in. Next guy. We hope to resolve this when we Subversion is ready 
and can be used as a backend.

> - the body of an OOo document is text (XML) but it's format
>   is optimised for reduced storage, not for efficient
>   versioning (as in a CVS/RCS or SCCS versioned file); it
>   might be best to actually store complete revisions in the
>   zipped (.sx*) format

Well, I don't know how the .sx* formats track changes, but it would be 
quite nice if those could be separated out at the server side (you save 
a file which contains changes and it is split up in server side versions).
Also the reverse, download a file with versions applied as changes.

> - OOo can compare different, even unrelated, documents

Cool.

> Given these points, I believe the main requirements for OOo are:
> - store the source URI in the document (useful for offline
>   editing)

Yes, sounds useful.

> - facilitate the user to to compare different revisions of a
>   document by providing an additional 'compare
>   version' menu item *when the original URI of a document
>   is a WebDAV server*.

WebDAV itself isn't a versioned protocol, you need the deltav extensions 
which are not really supported by a lot of servers.

> - OOo already supports WebDAV access, but it also needs an
>   improved "file open" UI to support navigation and version
>   selection (there was an earlier thread about WebDAV on the
>   groupware.openoffice.org mailing lists, see

Yes, it would be nice to have custom file open dialogs.

>> It will be used primarily by non-technical people, and thus DocBook and
>> tex, even html, is *way* to complicated.

Structured text is very simple an easy, IMHO. Anyway, may still be too 
difficult for non-techies.

regards,
   Helge

-- 
OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected]
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.