Re: open office collaboration
Helge Hess <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[email protected] wrote: > Here's my 2 cents: > - OOo doesn't store versions, it stores changes; this somewhat > supports collaboration, but it's best for sequential, not > parallel work This also matches the current OGo storage. Checkout a document, edit, check in. Next guy. We hope to resolve this when we Subversion is ready and can be used as a backend. > - the body of an OOo document is text (XML) but it's format > is optimised for reduced storage, not for efficient > versioning (as in a CVS/RCS or SCCS versioned file); it > might be best to actually store complete revisions in the > zipped (.sx*) format Well, I don't know how the .sx* formats track changes, but it would be quite nice if those could be separated out at the server side (you save a file which contains changes and it is split up in server side versions). Also the reverse, download a file with versions applied as changes. > - OOo can compare different, even unrelated, documents Cool. > Given these points, I believe the main requirements for OOo are: > - store the source URI in the document (useful for offline > editing) Yes, sounds useful. > - facilitate the user to to compare different revisions of a > document by providing an additional 'compare > version' menu item *when the original URI of a document > is a WebDAV server*. WebDAV itself isn't a versioned protocol, you need the deltav extensions which are not really supported by a lot of servers. > - OOo already supports WebDAV access, but it also needs an > improved "file open" UI to support navigation and version > selection (there was an earlier thread about WebDAV on the > groupware.openoffice.org mailing lists, see Yes, it would be nice to have custom file open dialogs. >> It will be used primarily by non-technical people, and thus DocBook and >> tex, even html, is *way* to complicated. Structured text is very simple an easy, IMHO. Anyway, may still be too difficult for non-techies. regards, Helge -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss