Re: OGo Directions / Java

[email protected] wrote: 
> On 18.12.2007, at 07:54, Sebastian Reitenbach wrote:
> > I did not meant, throwing it away. I don't think so, but do you plan  
> > on
> > backporting new features when they get added to JOPE to SOPE?
> 
> Why would I do that? Thats left to interested parties (eg ZNeK ported  
> quite a few JOPE AJAX features to SOPE).
> 
> > Or will it only be maintenance updates, e.g. compatibility updates and
> > bugfixes to SOPE?
> > Or will the code will become "unmaintained", as all the new work is  
> > done in
> > the new Java stuff?
> 
> That depends on who works on it! I already said what *I'm* going to do  
> in my 'sparetime'.
> Most enhancements to the OGo ObjC codebase are sponsored by commercial  
> customers anyways. So I suppose it depends on what *they* want to have  
> in the future ;-)
ok, got the picture I think.

> 
> Notably SOPE is also used by ScalableOGo, so I don't expect it to  
> become 'unmaintained' in any way.
ah, right, I forgot about that.

thanks 
Sebastian

-- 
OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected]
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss