Re: ogo website redesign
Adam Tauno Williams <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:53:06 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1235483586.5534.22.camel@linux-m3mt> |
> > I don't have too much time right now, but a few thoughts (most I > > mentioned in the past). > > - there should be a mockup. do not invest too much work > > before you know it will be accepted. > > - personally I thought about doing the OGo site like the > > SOPE/old-SOGo site (just use a styleshout template, use my > > StaticCMS publisher). > > - I haven't seen a FOSS CMS yet which I like :-/ Yea, I feel the same way. Actually I rather like Mojoportal <http://www.mojoportal.com/home.aspx> but that is like swatting a fly with a bulldozer for most use-cases. > > I would like to avoid the PHP hell if possible. As the admin of a very large and complex LAIP site (Linux, Apache, Informix/DB2, PHP) I can second the vote that the long-term maintenance of the PHP component of of the LAxP stack is pretty darn gruesome. This is why many (nearly all?) hosting providers still run antique versions of PHP; their forward compatibility is pretty shaky. And PEAR/PECL can get to be almost 10% as bad as Perl's CPAN [What only 10%? Everything is relative: nothing is as bad as CPAN, I'd choose Windows-For-Workgroups DLL hell over CPAN! In some language somewhere CPAN must mean: Updating-Will-Break-Everything.] Not that there aren't upsides to LAxP, but the easy-up-ness is paid for later. > > - I love tools which generate a static site. Maybe this > > one: http://site.ringce.com/products/hyde/hyde.html ? > > Preferences mostly. I probably wouldn't refuse some Typo3 or Joomla > > setup, but those are certainly '-' points. > > Be prepared that the work might be rejected, we won't accept something > > just because it was done by some volunteer! Hence: *mockup*!! > > Also consider who is going to maintain the website when its in place! > > (Frank certainly won't admin a Joomla site!) I would like to avoid the > > Plone 'situation' ;-/ > > I know, its a bit discouraging :-> We definitely need to improve the > > website and help would be very welcome. But lets not get 'bloated'. I can't image this being a site with more than a dozen or so pages. With a handful of people who have perform modifications. If editing is easy that is a plus since it makes it more likely to happen. > I got that point, make it as nice as possible but keep future maintenance as > simple as possible too. E.g. a website update should be as simple as a svn ci > command. > before implementing anything, we will propose some designs, layed out in gimp > or sth. like that, and try to stick to some CSS stylesheets. Excellent! > Adam, when you have figured out, how to set permissions on plone so that a > group can edit a page, could you setup one, and post a link to it here, or > let me know, and I'll setup one. Actually you can create a page if you want and then I can go in and edit the permissions [I'm pretty sure]. -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss