Re: PIM or CIM
Helge Hess <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 17.10.2003, at 15:56, Robert Slater wrote: > I have been lurking here for a while...[A long post] ;-) long posts take a long time to answer, but finally ... > This converstion is made possible by the opt-in mailing list. > I think the power of this form of communication is vastly under-rated > as a > communications model. Opengroupware is being develped along with most > other > open-source projects with the mailing list pivotal to that development. > I believe the"email" component is incidental to the communication > model. Hm. Personally I find Bugzilla as an issue tracking tool much more important than mailing lists. > I have joined this thread [PIM or CIM ] a sub-project of the > overall project called [email protected] > > Because I promoted myself i have very low "status" and this > contribution to > the"idea" may or may not be responded to by better know and respected > contributers. > The more involved in the overall project a contributer the higher the > status. I think I get your point, but given that we are (not yet ;-) dealing with thousands of contributors we have no real "status". > The highest status is initially given to the person who started the > overall project. > Status is not defined by volume of communication [troll] but by > quality of > contribution. This can either be in a single thread [specialist] or > across the > entire project. [manager/executive] Importantly there is no "knowledge > lockout" > Any person interested in the overall project can contribute. [even me] > A very flat organisational structure indeed! Yip. > Now the tricky bit.. As we all know trying to organise a time to do > something on > a mail list is like herding cats.. People who actually want to do *work* are invited at both: Bugzilla or even AIM. > This may be a function of open-source development rather than an > intrinsic > failure in the model though. > In a business there is a structure and if the highest ranking person > says. > Meeting at 2.00pm. There is going to a meeting. How you extract this > in to > meaningful individual time-lines though is beyond me.. Yes, a mailing list is inappropriate for that, which is why we have Bugzilla. Hm, maybe I don't really get your whole point, but also OGo is *not yet* (I really hope that this will change) a really community driven project, but rather driven by SKYRIX AG. So when we setup a meeting at 2:00PM MET, it will happen at that time ;-) regards, Helge -- OpenGroupware.org http://www.opengroupware.org/ -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss