Re: questions
Dan Bar <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> I mean groupware in the way that i will share data between many > users. They will need rights on the data or printers shared by group > for example. You see? > OGo advantage might be understood as unifying element in user's data. So after creating "a project", all [usually needed] relevant data can be grouped together (files, mails etc.). One problem might be in integration of "OGo style" of datafile storage and Samba as there is no (AFAIK) automatic access rights handling when accessing OGo data through Samba. There is one Bugreport enh post for creation of Samba VFS module than would handle that (AFAIK no one is working on it). Another possibility is to access OGo datafiles through WebDAV. (skyprojectd or maybe Zidestore. Don't know if ZS implementation of WebDAV is finished. Haven't tested any of these yet) > hi, I'm working on a free groupware project in my company with > openldap, samba, qmail on freebsd 5.1 The target is to substitute > Microsofts Server 2000. So it's a file server, a print server, a mail > server around a central ldap directory (openldap) for authnetication. There might be two equations: MS Server 2000 ~ (might be) Linux + Samba + LDAP + CUPS [lprng ...] (+ DHCP, BIND, Postfix ...) OGo ~ MS Exchange (so it's a MS Server 2000 + Exchange) > Can opengroupware be better for me? faster ? easier? it depends what do you expect to handle on your net. Dan -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss