Re: OGo, CRM and other field specific software (LONG)
Chris H <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Michael Dean wrote: > Sugar CPM should not be the yardstick to measure Ogo. its not > Again, Sugar is a suck-in for a commercial product, just like Compierre. perhaps but nothing wrong with commercial software provided its standards compliant and comes with source. Cost formula's are the copyright holders choice not end user prerequisites or determined. Our choice is to use it or not. Nor do I think that development should be "democratized" into some large amorphous committee voting on features. Its not. Helge determines the direction, many add patches, some add features which may or may not make it into the release code, those who cant code post or write docs or otherwise help out on the user lists. > I do think OGo could take the Linux kernel approach, with additions > peopple want submitted in a debugged format to the core developers. This is in place. > I also think that a Paypal donate site on sourceforge and the home > website with a general plea for general non-discretionary donations > would be in order. this exists already. > Also, if the price of the docs were lowered a little this would serve > to increase its sales and generate funds for improved development. There is no fee for OGo docs. Pls see docs.opengroupware.org and for the latest release candidate User Guide please connect with asterisk.opengroupware.org:8080 in the language of your choice. /ch -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss