Re: OGo & Netmail vs cyrus
Helge Hess <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mar 29, 2005, at 16:53, Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> the backend server (netmail) is full featured > Compared to Cyrus it seems pretty bland to me. I think the issue is that Netmail is supposed to be a cross platform solution. If the same software is supposed to run on Windows it is somewhat bound to s*** on Unix. Eg you basically choose to ignore the whole mail system infrastructure which is available for Unix, including stuff like SpamAssassin, fetchmail, procmail, etc > Changing ACLs on folders is the only > real gripe I have since nothing supports the ACL extension. Surprising. This is rather easy to implement (just some work ...) > Cyrus is bundled with just about every distribution so I don't see that > installation as any kind of hurdle, and it is very actively maintained. Si. And for those who consider Cyrus too big we still have Dovecot. Having yet another mail server just makes _zero_ sense. >> The later can be tested but the former may be a concern. > Netmail's feature set doesn't seem to bring anything to the table > (IMHO). In contrary. You'll loose all the standard tools. Greets, Helge -- http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/ OpenGroupware.org -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss