Re: OGo & quasar accounting

chris h <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 11:37, Michael Brown wrote:

to keep it OGo focussed...comments in line.

> I'd looked at this one a while ago too, but decided on
> SQL-Ledger from http://www.sql-ledger.com for several
> key reasons.
>
> + SQL-Ledger is web-based, similar to OGo's web-ui.
> Quasar is client/server, with a QT "thick" client.

Thats a matter or choice. Most I serve dont like web clients for all the right 
reasons for accounting apps. YMMV dependant on your customers who always 
determine your requirements. 

> + SQL-Ledger has been GPL'd since the beginning, and
> has a fairly extensive support infrastructure (ie,
> mailing lists and lots of stuff on the web including
> WIKI's)  There's also just one product, with paying
> customers getting first kick at the can, so to speak
> (more current version that what gets released
> publicly).  Quasar has the GPL'd version, and the
> "Retail" version.

Retail is non restricted GPL version ie: many companies. GPL version is 
restricted to one company account. ie: you can do the accounting for one firm 
only but that firm's clients and customers are unlimited. 

> + SQL-Ledger has supported PostgreSQL since the
> beginning.  Quasar's support is a more recent thing.
> I've heard that Dieter (the author of SQL-Ledger) has
> done some PG triggers to sync OGo's
> contacts/Enterprises and SQL-Ledgers
> vendors/customers, so integration is possible on the
> PG front.

You have a URL for notes on this as this is what I was considering eventually 
for Quasar once it test it thoroughly. That would be the entire point of the 
exercise, one centralized contact db source.

thanks for your comments. 

regards

/ch
-- 
OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected]
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.