Re: OGo & quasar accounting
chris h <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 11:37, Michael Brown wrote: to keep it OGo focussed...comments in line. > I'd looked at this one a while ago too, but decided on > SQL-Ledger from http://www.sql-ledger.com for several > key reasons. > > + SQL-Ledger is web-based, similar to OGo's web-ui. > Quasar is client/server, with a QT "thick" client. Thats a matter or choice. Most I serve dont like web clients for all the right reasons for accounting apps. YMMV dependant on your customers who always determine your requirements. > + SQL-Ledger has been GPL'd since the beginning, and > has a fairly extensive support infrastructure (ie, > mailing lists and lots of stuff on the web including > WIKI's) There's also just one product, with paying > customers getting first kick at the can, so to speak > (more current version that what gets released > publicly). Quasar has the GPL'd version, and the > "Retail" version. Retail is non restricted GPL version ie: many companies. GPL version is restricted to one company account. ie: you can do the accounting for one firm only but that firm's clients and customers are unlimited. > + SQL-Ledger has supported PostgreSQL since the > beginning. Quasar's support is a more recent thing. > I've heard that Dieter (the author of SQL-Ledger) has > done some PG triggers to sync OGo's > contacts/Enterprises and SQL-Ledgers > vendors/customers, so integration is possible on the > PG front. You have a URL for notes on this as this is what I was considering eventually for Quasar once it test it thoroughly. That would be the entire point of the exercise, one centralized contact db source. thanks for your comments. regards /ch -- OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss