Re: Terminology used in OGo

Kelley G <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.discuss.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Michael Brown wrote:

>Hi Folks!
>
>I've created a couple of bugs regarding terminology
>used in the English Translation of OGo, and I'd
>thought I'd bounce this off of you folks for your
>opinions.
>
>Should the terms used in the WebUI be similar to
>existing products out there?  I ask this, because I'm
>looking through the product with an eye towards an
>end-user's point of view, and I see differences in
>terms when I compare OGo to say Outlook.
>
>For example repeating appointments in OGo are called
>"cycle" or "cyclic" appointments, whereas in Outlook
>they're called "recurrence".  Should we use the same
>terms as Outlook that describe the same functionality?
> I'm thinking this could be useful in the case of
>people using the OGo webui like Outlook's Web Access,
>and are using the Zidelook connector with Outlook on
>the desktop.
>
>Opinions?  I'm working my way through OGo, and I'm
>prepared to raise bugs and add patch files if folks
>think it's worth while.
>
>Thanks for your time!
>
>/Mike
>
>______________________________________________________________________ 
>Post your free ad now! http://personals.yahoo.ca
>  
>
'cylcic' is not commonly used in this manner.
the term 'recurring' is much better suited to people and social contexts 
in general.

cyclic imples regidity or an 'impersonal pattern'. nature cycles, the 
earth's path around the sun is cyclic.
the diurnal 'cycle'. etc.

people recur. although one could say the upgrade pattern imposed by 
certian monopolies upon their users
is cyclic. :)

regards,

-- 

kelley g

oooooooooooooooooooooooooo
http://toasterz.com
http://exchangekiller.com
oooooooooooooooooooooooooo

-- 
OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected]
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.