Re: OGo and asterisk, SUMMARY

On Nov 24, 2006, at 16:16, chris h wrote:
>> I think it is very important to keep things general-purpose;  if
>> people need very specific functionality OGo provides to means for
>> users to construct front-ends to the general purpose functionality  
>> via
>> an intranet or other means.
> Btw, blogs are not really that bad when properly used assuming that  
> the editor
> has received a basic level of <snicker> training?

Yes, and IMHO this wasn't Adam's point. I think his point is that a  
blogging application would be written as a separate app on top of the  
OGo infrastructure. Eg a blog could be easily build on top of an OGo  
project.

Which in fact is something I very much consider. Its more or less my  
idea for the future of OGo, producing more focused interfaces on top  
of the OGo infrastructure.
Aka the "groupware construction kit" ;-)

Greets,
   Helge
-- 
Helge Hess
http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/


-- 
OpenGroupware.org Discussion [email protected]
http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss