Re: Status, Information, daily built?
Adam Tauno Williams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.opengroupware.user |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
(message translated by Google, I think it did a so-so job) >> But who now drives the OGO advancement? > There are different people in different places something forward. It is an Open Source project, so anyone can pick it up and drag it further forward. Myself and my employer are doing quite a bit with OGo, >> Who operates the SVN server? > The server runs on gesponsorter hardware (unfortunately only 1 server > formerly of 4 is left / not broken). The hosting is sponsored by MDlink > (www.mdlink.de). Setup / Maintenance Svn make ZNeK and Frank. What has been your experience with GoogleCode now that JOPE/GETObjects has been over there for awhile? <http://code.google.com/p/getobjects/> >> What about the nightly builts? > Nightly builds are managed by Frank, but for lack of hardware are > currently largely off. Who needs nightly, build themselves. > IMHO should all build on Open SuSE migrated, but the does not belong > here. If someone whose acceptance would the toll. Hm, I think the translator smacked this one. :) The only really hard part of getting something set up on the Novell build service is that it is so *@&$*(@* slow. By the time something succeeds or fails your on to doing something else. >> It is not the ultimate objective of OGO, but OGO >> Met with Thunderbird and the Lightning already have a replacement >> Large part of what make an Outlook replacement. And there >> Everywhere few alternatives under Linux. >> But apparently no one interested in the more, since it relies on so-small >> Flame until cooked ignored, which makes it the hair raufen (not >> Only at OGO, generally in the open source world). > Yes, marketing is a problem. It makes no sense but also something to > market is still not 100% runs smoothly (such as Lightning). But much closer than we were a few weeks ago. :) Anyway, promoting/marketing OGo isn't particularly hard. Even with its deficiencies it is a very interesting product; it is still one of a kind. >> Only need the current SVN OGO to Lightning 0.7 to use, but I am testing with Lightning 0.8. I haven't done any testing with 0.7 >> Not everyone is happy OGO SVN from the building itself. > Correctly, a new release would be 'times' appropriate. But the > is a lot of work. -- OpenGroupware.org Users [email protected] http://mail.opengroupware.org/mailman/listinfo/users