RE: RFD: contents.rdf Spec v0.1
"Roger Fischer" <roger.fischer-zfZwwz/hh/[email protected]> Wed, 19 Mar 2003 15:11:44 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom.twingle.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > 10) We need to have a debate about "article" vs. "document" (or > > "page") for the name of the resourcetype across systems. > > getting into semantic territory here huh Not sure, where the discussion on this is at the moment. Bitflux does it like this: - page = rendered webpage, defined by an URI - document = abstracted content-gatherer which can include several types of objects like article, video, file, mediaobject => is most often rendered as one page - article = abstract basic textobject which can contain xrefs to other objects like images, video, files etc. By "abstract" I mean something without presentation. > > > 11) Do we need an encoding attribute in the XML declaration? > > dunno Let's do it the same way as with all XML documents. The default is UTF-8, one can use encoding if you want. Best regards Roger