Re: [OSCOM] ANN: Magnolia 3.0 Simple Enterprise Content Management released
Michelle Heizer <[email protected]> Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:13:45 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martin Bähr wrote: > http://www.magnolia.info/en/magnolia/products/faq.html#IsthesourcecodefortheEnterpriseEd > Is the source code for the Enterprise Edition available? > > Most of the code of the Enterprise Edition is open-sourced and available > in the Community Edition. The Enterprise Edition ships with additional > features not found in the Community Edition and is licensed via the > "Magnolia Visible Source" license. The visible-source license allows you > to modify the Enterprise Edition for your own use, but disallows > distribution or deployment of the binary. > > this violates free redistribution, and hence this license is not > free software nor open source. I disagree that this means the software is not open source. We can argue the semantics of the term "open source" all day, but a definition does not hold up in court if it is ever challenged. Every person or organization can come up with their own definition of open source, but that doesn't give it any legal weight. What does hold up in court is the license the software is released under. Let's be clear. There are many open source licenses available, including a developer's own license (as it appears in the case of this software). In the end, a developer should consult a lawyer before opening up their source code and an end-user should consult one as well if they are worried about the future repercussions of using the software and if they are unclear on what they can and cannot do with it. Back to the original point: > Most of the code of the Enterprise Edition is open-sourced As an open source CMS, it is perfectly valid to post an announcement on the list. Unless the list is only for "CMSes that are free, open source (by XYZ's definition), allow for redistribution and are released under the XYZ license". We'll need a bigger acronym than OSCOM for that though. (and don't get me started on how tough it will be to reach a consensus on the definition of "XYZ") ;) Regards, Michelle