Re: [OSCOM] Sandro steps back

Paul Everitt wrote:

snip
>
> At this stage, we should probably constrain feedback to "I cannot  
> accept that election process" instead of "Maybe it would be better  
> if".  It's not easy, at this stage, to tell when a discussion ends  
> and how to convert open discussion into policy.
>
>   

As I mentioned, what is important to me is the make-up of the decision 
making body to steer OSCOM to open up and to find newer audience because 
I don't find it neutral or far-reaching.

If I get this right, members and board decides policies and projects?

If so, one needs to field "ideas" during the ideas stage. They need to 
be discussed. Also, this seems myopic or tunnel vision when topics are 
generated by the same demographics like developers.

We could field ideas by putting quetionaires on the OSCOM site.

> --Paul
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>