[OSCOM] about bylaws, board and committes
[email protected] Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:27:03 +0700
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Have been thinking (again!) These are just thoughts and not sure at what stage they will be relevant but I thought we could make a note of them for future reference It is not clear what is the current plan for reorganization, but the following items would come to me as to be considered sooner rather than later: A board of 5 members seems excessive for such a small, relatively informal organisation. - lighten up the bylaws to make them less binding. IMHO these should be a bare minimum to comply with the law, what we have currently in place seems to me the format of a large 'holding' company, probably creating unnecessary organisational requirements. We could look for a solicitor/volunteer among new members to help us do that - decide if the company should stay registered in Switzerland (should it?) - a board of probably 3 members would be more than enough (chair, secretary, treasurer) IMHO the role of the board is purely administrative, and the board would not make any executive decisions per se (board would make decisions like all other members) but would just provide the signatures - we should have an executive committee - all the good people who have volunteerd to be board members should be in the committee. the role of this would be to get things done that cannot be done by individuals/teams in the community, including liaising with the board for the purpose of fulflilling administrative tasks - decisions and initiatives should be taken and shared by all members, via list discussion and voting - this means that the role of developing and bringing forth OSCOM mission would not be down to 5 people, but to the whole membership base or whoever has energy/ideas there - this could make the group more powerful Think Lean! PDM