Re: [OSCOM] board voting results
Martin Baehr <mbaehr-J82dVEKiPgVsIEQYbtjsvCEcasqEdqbRs2V0tQ3P5b8@public.gmane.org> Fri, 22 Sep 2006 14:00:30 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.oscom |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Sep 22, 2006 at 09:50:14AM +0200, Andrea Resmini wrote: > But, although I'm completely for clearing up the issue in order not to = > leave any legal loophole standing, I think that this could be also seen = > as an election following a simple Ordinary Meeting, regulated by Art. 5 = > par. 2, which poses no such legal requirement. the requirement is in 5.4. but i like pauls interpretation of the extraordinary meeting. since some people expressed the need for a vote, that could be interpreted as a request for a meeting. also the majority of people voted which is further approval. greetings, martin. -- = cooperative communication with sTeam - caudium, pike, roxen and un= ix offering: programming, training and administration - anywhere in the wor= ld -- pike programmer travelling and working in europe open-steam.o= rg unix system- bahai.or.at iaeste.(tuwien.ac|or).= at administrator (caudium|gotpike).org is.schon.o= rg Martin B=E4hr http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/