Re: [OSCOM] reply-to munging (or lack thereof) again. (was: Ajax and CMS])

This thread is becoming unpleasant.  If there are others that want to  
change the group's previous decision, then please speak up.  However,  
if there isn't general support, then this thread should drop.

--Paul

On May 4, 2005, at 8:22 PM, Rahul Singh ( Anant ) wrote:

> If it is such an issue about "privacy" then this shouldn't be a public
> list. Public lists by their very nature shoudl be completely open. If
> it is such a requirement why don't you make [email protected]
>
> Specificity isn't a problem if you do it correctly. Making specific
> lists for specific purposes makes it easy for everyone.
>
> Apart from the public lists that I moderate, I currently have 30 or so
> team lists in my company which are a mixture of both. Some lists in
> which teams are sent information from nonmembers. In this scenario,
> munging is not done. That's because the outside user is sending a
> request for information or likewise and the team members can email
> back to the user using "reply-to". This doesn't promote "discussion"
> and it is not supposed to. It is meant clearly as a way to retrieve
> information.
>
> Others where its mostly for internal team communication, munging is
> turned on to promote discussion. Outside members if they wish to join,
> KNOW that they are joining to discuss. This is precisely how "bb"
> software like vBulletin, PhpBB work.
>
> What is the purpose of this group, if not to discuss?
>
> Rahul
>
> On 5/4/05, Martin Bähr <mbaehr-J82dVEKiPgVsIEQYbtjsvCEcasqEdqbRs2V0tQ3P5b8@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>
>> lazyness has nothing to do with it.
>> privacy has!
>>
>> we had reply-to munging on this list.
>> it caused a few private mails that should not have gone to the  
>> list to
>> be sent here by accident.
>>
>> the munging was removed on user request for user convenience: to  
>> make it
>> easy on the user to not make harmfull mistakes.
>>
>> it is not the admins that are lazy here, on the contrary. the admins
>> actually had to make an effort and change this to the current  
>> state to
>> protect the users privacy and follow the users wishes.
>>
>> now you come and wish the opposite. fine, but please honor the  
>> wishes of
>> the majority of users on this list, none of which have argued  
>> agains the
>> change last time it happened. admins have nothing to do with it, i am
>> sure they will happliy comply if the majority of the list actually
>> wishes so. personally i don't care either way, i can rely on mutt to
>> ignore reply-to list and thus i don't need sane list settings to  
>> protect
>> my privacy.
>>
>> greetings, martin.
>> --
>> cooperative communication with sTeam      -     caudium, pike,  
>> roxen and unix
>> offering: programming, training and administration   -  anywhere  
>> in the world
>> --
>> pike programmer   travelling and working in europe              
>> open-steam.org
>> unix system-      bahai.or.at                        iaeste. 
>> (tuwien.ac|or).at
>> administrator     (caudium|gotpike).org                           
>> is.schon.org
>> Martin Bähr       http://www.iaeste.or.at/~mbaehr/
>>
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Rahul Singh
> rahul.singh-nlu/[email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> General mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://oscom.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/general
>