Re: [Tiki-devel] How a developper can be hired for Tiki jobs ?

yup, sounds good enough for me?

luci


On 08.02.2021 9:29, Bsfez Tiki via TikiWiki-devel wrote:
> Re-thinking…
>
> I see we have a "category" Support request.
>
>
> So I would say we refactor this item into "Support request (willing to 
> pay or donate to fix the issue)"
>
> We add a note that is displayed if this option is selected :
> "Using this option you are signalling to the Tiki developers or 
> consultants that your issue is important enough for you to pay a 
> bounty for a quick solution independently of the coderspriorities.
> This 'fast track' option and anything that may follow will be an 
> agreement between individuals and in no case Tiki Association will or 
> should be involved in this agreement and its consequences.
> This, even if the coders ask for the bounty to be paid as a donation 
> to the Tiki Association."
>
>
>
> Optional: a user-selector with a label like : I’m also interested in a 
> solution for this ticket and I’m willing to participate financially to 
> the effort. (please reword)
>
> Is that good enough for you people ?
>
> Bernard
>
>
>> On 27 Jan 2021, at 18:22 , Torsten Fabricius via TikiWiki-devel 
>> <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> I see it as Bernard.
>> Association or kind of "official community" should not be involved in 
>> private contracts.
>> Too risky for the association or tthe community and who would be in 
>> charge in case of claims?
>>
>> --T
>>
>> Am 27.01.21 um 13:23 schrieb Bsfez Tiki via TikiWiki-devel:
>>> Mmm…
>>>
>>> I think Tiki Association shouldn’t be involved in any way.
>>>
>>> We just facilitate people to talk. Everything else is a private 
>>> transaction/discussion between 2 parties.
>>> Can be legal implication…
>>>
>>> The only thing I would eventually do is to emphasis (if people from 
>>> outside come into it) that commit inside tiki code should respect 
>>> Tiki guidelines or something like that…
>>>
>>>
>>> B
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 27 Jan 2021, at 10:54 , Gary Cunningham-Lee 
>>>> <gary_c-39LOpZwlz1/[email protected] <mailto:gary_c-39LOpZwlz1/[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> If we do this, I think it would be good for the form input to have 
>>>> a description/help block/disclaimer something like:
>>>>
>>>> "In principle, Tiki developers contribute their time as open source 
>>>> project volunteers as they respond to bug reports and feature 
>>>> requests to implement the most pressing bug fixes and widely useful 
>>>> feature enhancements. However, providing an option for a Tiki 
>>>> software user to pay an individual developer for a bug fix or 
>>>> feature enhancement is being introduced to 'fast track' coding that 
>>>> might otherwise not be done quickly or at all, due to the 
>>>> priorities of the coders."
>>>>
>>>> More details could be added about how this payment process would 
>>>> work (and probably should be maybe on a linked page, not in the 
>>>> form itself), but I thought it would be good to make it clear that 
>>>> the project's priority is on volunteer coder contributions and this 
>>>> isn't a money-making scheme for TSCA.
>>>>
>>>> -- Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 1/26/2021 12:44 AM, Bsfez Tiki via TikiWiki-devel wrote:
>>>>> My first reflex was:
>>>>> Sure…
>>>>> Shouldn't be complicate to had a username or email.
>>>>>
>>>>> Then:
>>>>> However if we don’t keep it simple and good enough (doesn’t have 
>>>>> to be the ultimate feature) it may turn into a long discussion 
>>>>> with no progress. 🤗
>>>>>
>>>>> I think that we can start with a list "ok to pay for it" + the 
>>>>> username that saved.
>>>>> (Item link to another tracker with a add item button ?)
>>>>>
>>>>> It will initiate the idea of "paying dev fixes" and for more 
>>>>> people can always use comments to speak their mind or to even 
>>>>> group (paying together a fix).
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> B
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 25 Jan 2021, at 17:02 , Dr. Sassafras<[email protected] 
>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it also might be good to keep in mind that the author of 
>>>>>> the ticket might not be the only person who wants to see 
>>>>>> something fixed or implemented.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Brendan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 25, 2021, at 6:33 AM, Bsfez Tiki via 
>>>>>>> TikiWiki-devel<[email protected] 
>>>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> TikiWiki-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected] 
>>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TikiWiki-devel mailing list
>>>> [email protected] 
>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TikiWiki-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TikiWiki-devel mailing list
>> [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TikiWiki-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel

_______________________________________________
TikiWiki-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/tikiwiki-devel