Re: 1 cset was pushed to modules/sitecontact: oops - no upgrade wanted here ...forgot ...
"Jason Judge" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.bk-notices |
|---|---|
| Organization | Xaraya |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
The first three parts of a version number will result in an upgrade, but anything there-after is automatically recorded, but will not force an upgrade. It is best to keep to numbers throughout, but after the first three numbers, it is up to the author. I'm not actually sure an RFC was ever written that specified any of this (including the three-part format of module versions). So, the module upgrade process will *only* look at the first three parts when comparing version numbers of a module.It will try to handle non-standard version numbers sensibly, so 0.1.2 == 00.01.02 == .1.2. == 0.1.2.3.4.5.6 wrt upgrades. -- JJ "Chris Dudley" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:[email protected]... > Jo Dalle Nogare wrote: > > Changes were applied by jojodee to modules/sitecontact level 20. > > The following cset was applied: > > > > ChangeSet > > 1.298 05/05/26 21:33:28 jojodee-CZ0/[email protected] +1 -0 > > oops - no upgrade wanted here ...forgot the dot > > > > xarversion.php > > 1.7 05/05/26 21:33:27 jojodee-CZ0/[email protected] +1 -1 > > oops - no upgrade wanted here ...forgot the dot > > > > Links for the differences: > > http://xaraya.com:15000/modules/sitecontact/[email protected] > > > I thought the RFC stated all versions should be only 3 fields and should > be entirely numeric? > > So should this be 0.0.2 or 0.0.3 ? > > miko