Re: 456 csets were pushed to core/uiscrub: default.xt, admin.xt: qa...
Marcel van der Boom <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.bk-notices |
|---|---|
| Organization | Xaraya |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
FYI: This huge merge contains at least 3 csets with new work, which are these: Marty Vance wrote: > Links for the differences: > http://xaraya.com:15000/core/uiscrub/[email protected] > http://xaraya.com:15000/core/uiscrub/[email protected] > http://xaraya.com:15000/core/uiscrub/[email protected] There may be more. One remark on the 1.2134 cset. This seems another approach to the corecss scenario to me. Having a bit of a confusing merge pattern in that scenario already, I think it would be advisable to reach consensus on the implementation on the ML first and then implement it in one scenario, instead of in two. I had some strong comments on the older corecss scenario. I also have them on this implementation. But lets not go into that here, but on the committer list. Having two scenarios solving (possibly the same) problem is going to lead to confusion I think. I might be wrong of course, in that case, please explain it on the committer list, i'm confuzzled. ;-) marcel