Re: Global Integration System
[email protected] (mikespub) Mon, 19 Apr 2004 17:53:55 GMT
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Organization | not much |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
In article <c5q6cc$7o6$1-111RdWWlOxkOkXtL6OYfHgC/[email protected]>, laibcoms-/[email protected](Laibeus Lord) wrote: > >Quoted from: >http://forums.invisionpower.com/index.php?showtopic=28771# > >in the market, we call this a GIS... Global Integration System... > GIS generally means Geographic Information Systems in the IT world, not that other thing - of course, they may be talking about some other market :-) >... >Combine the two you get a true GIS. But no one cares to combine the >two. There's division instead of unity. There's strength in unity. >Xaraya has proven to be better than nukes and other CMS. On the other >hand, IPBv2 has already shown that it surpassed vBulletin. Isn't it >time to share minds? > >A true GIS - xarVision ;p (ok that's a lame title ;p ) but you do get >the meaning so back to work. >... I doubt that Xaraya and IPB will merge someday - their primary goals are different. However, that doesn't mean that we can't improve how they work together. At the moment, "integration" is limited to an authentication module in Xaraya that allows you to use IPB's user database instead of Xaray's own user database. This could mean two things : a) it's easier to extend Xaraya to use some external user database than to extend IPB to do the same, or b) it's easier to access IPB's user database than to access Xaraya's user database for authentication purposes, or c) both of the above - which is probably the fairest way to put things :-) So if we want to continue down this road, we need to make sure that 1. IPB is easier to extend and to integrate with external systems 2. Xaraya is easier to integrate from external systems Both goals can be achieved separately, as long as there's some common denominator somewhere - or some common vision of what the interfaces should look like. And the same applies to re-using other parts of either environment. Unfortunately, with so many different systems out there, we don't seem to agree on common interfaces beyond the basics. /me hands over the microphone to Gregor now - www.oscom.org :-) Mike.