DDF and Xaraya licensing concerns
Chris Dudley <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Organization | Xaraya News Server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
OK so that seems to be confusing more people. hmm I'll try again. First off the DDF is a legal entity. Its a registered company and we are in the process of obtaining 501c3 tax registered status from the IRS. Second it is not a case of developers signing away their rights. The license we ask core developers (and only core developers) to agree to grants the DDF rights to the Xaraya code. It is a non-exclusive agreement. So the developers still retain the copyright on that code outside of Xaraya, should they submit it to say another project then they are free to do so and it would not involve Xaraya or the DDF. We have not publicised much about the DDF yet since the website isn't finalised yet - we were waiting for Xaraya to reach beta first. The DDF bylaws are very similar to the Apache Foundation. It has an elected Board of Directors, a lawyer, accountant, etc... all the usual features you would expect of any registered company. Since the Xaraya core team makes up the DDF membership then it will only act in the best interests of the Xaraya project. No one person in the DDF can railroad policy over the others - quorum votes are needed from the 35 or so members in order for changes to the bylaws, membership or other decisions to be made. The DDF has no say in the day to day running of Xaraya - that is up to the PMC (John, Marcel, Paul and Gregor), all of whom are of course members of the DDF as are all the PostNuke developers who left to form Xaraya, along with some others. There are defined means for removing a member of both the PMC and the Board of directors. The exact same process as Apache uses. Again its a legally registered company and so we must follow the recognised process for this. There is no way anyone or even a small group could enforce their will over the majority - a simple vote would put paid to that. I can understand how misunderstandings could occur as nothing about the DDF had been made public to date (as already stated we were waiting for the beta to launch the website which contains all this information). For a rough guide do look at the Apache Foundation. the model is the same. I hope this has alleviated some people's worries. If anyone has any questions please do let me know - I'm more than happy to answer them. miko