Re: Re: Fw: [Xaraya_curiosa] FW: Re: Proprietary Modules and GPL API (from postnuke devel list)

"brihana25" <bri-CWN3/ZM48zxWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.curiosa
Organization Xaraya News Server
Message-ID <[email protected]>
"Gregory Remington" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:mailman.1047259381.358.xaraya_curiosa-n5IRV0TL0hwRxVAL8JNkP+OyGI2DFzLe@public.gmane.org
> GNU/FSF Webmaster Ray Soucy Writes:
>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
<snip>
> > If a developer, or developers wanted to release something under
> > different licenses, they need each copyright holder's permission to
> > release it under a new license, this is another reason why assigning
> > copyright to the FSF is a good idea, the FSF can keep people from
> > doing this to your software if you assign the copyright to them.
> >


Is there an argument /against/ the DDF in here somewhere?  Other than the
fact that we could be considered direct "competitors" with the FSF on the
copyright assignment issue?

--
bri

xaraya - content management and so much more
[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.