Re: Re: Fw: [Xaraya_curiosa] FW: Re: Proprietary Modules and GPL API (from postnuke devel list)
"brihana25" <bri-CWN3/ZM48zxWk0Htik3J/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.curiosa |
|---|---|
| Organization | Xaraya News Server |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
"Gregory Remington" <[email protected]> wrote in message news:mailman.1047259381.358.xaraya_curiosa-n5IRV0TL0hwRxVAL8JNkP+OyGI2DFzLe@public.gmane.org > GNU/FSF Webmaster Ray Soucy Writes: > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > <snip> > > If a developer, or developers wanted to release something under > > different licenses, they need each copyright holder's permission to > > release it under a new license, this is another reason why assigning > > copyright to the FSF is a good idea, the FSF can keep people from > > doing this to your software if you assign the copyright to them. > > Is there an argument /against/ the DDF in here somewhere? Other than the fact that we could be considered direct "competitors" with the FSF on the copyright assignment issue? -- bri xaraya - content management and so much more [email protected]