Re: Module Ownership Rollcall
jojodee <jojodee-8nna1qhvBBM9QQeoy3GH/[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.devel |
|---|---|
| Organization | Xaraya |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hb wrote: > Marcel van der Boom schrieb: >> I do agree though with the concept of 'being responsible for...' or >> 'maintainership...'. If that should be translated into an ownership type >> of deal I'm not so sure. > > I agree that 'Ownership' questions on modules or even on bugs contradict very > much from the common goal. > I don't at all. Please read my reply to Dracos' similar voicing of this. 'ownership' from a project point of view is normal and beneficial imho for this project. I posted on this in this thread. 'ownership' in opensource - is a key concept for project or module and i posted a link to an article that has a good reputation and elucidates more on this topic than i will dare to here. Both of these 'ownership' concepts are different - and either or both are beneficial to the Xaraya project. Jo -- http://xarigami.com :: Creative web development with Xaraya http://2skies.com :: Open source hosting and development