Re: Module Ownership Rollcall

jojodee <jojodee-8nna1qhvBBM9QQeoy3GH/[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.cms.xaraya.devel
Organization Xaraya
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hb wrote:
> Marcel van der Boom schrieb:
>> I do agree though with the concept of 'being responsible for...' or
>> 'maintainership...'. If that should be translated into an ownership type
>> of deal I'm not so sure.
> 
> I agree that 'Ownership' questions on modules or even on bugs contradict very
> much from the common goal.
> 

I don't at all.

Please read my reply to Dracos' similar voicing of this.

'ownership' from a project point of view is normal and beneficial imho
for this project. I posted on this in this thread.

'ownership' in opensource - is a key concept for project or module and i
posted a link to an article that has a good reputation and elucidates
more on this topic than i will dare to here.


Both of these 'ownership' concepts are different - and either or both
are beneficial to the Xaraya project.

Jo


-- 
http://xarigami.com :: Creative web development with Xaraya
http://2skies.com   :: Open source hosting and development
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.