Re: Need Clarification

"stratagem" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
news:[email protected]...
> Ok?  So it's meaningless to refer to it from other documents then? That's 
> how I found it.

No it was requested at the time in relation to a conversation, and was 
useful at the time in that context and for the task list at the time.

> Another question.
>
> If all this is taking place as articles on the website, how is it going 
> from there to say a txt file or pdf for inclusion in releases or at the 
> very least for download by users?

The XUG and MDG will be available in distro when complete, that's important. 
Some script prolly and miko was going to address that later - not sure if 
himself or not - once the new stuff was available.

Jo
>
>
>
> jojodee wrote:
>> It's not really something to be referenced formally. It's a rough 
>> 'representation' of a matrix i did on scrap paper, and my son coloured in 
>> . Not something for formal or public consumption really. Is useful only 
>> as an example of some thoughts i had on priorities for docs at the time, 
>> and because someone asked for a copy. It was used privately as an example 
>> attached to a task list we had going back weeks ago. It refers to 
>> different documentation categories/types we have on xar.com (across the 
>> top) and areas that are priority for inclusion in docs.
>>
>> Jo
>>
>>
>> "stratagem" <[email protected]> wrote in message 
>> news:[email protected]...
>>
>>>http://www.xaraya.com/%7Ejojodee/xartasks/docmatrix1.html
>>>
>>>Can someone provide a legend for that document?
>>>
>>>Also, why isn't it broken down into core vice rest?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>stratagem
>>
>>