Re: AW: No default für boolean attributes
Peter Zechmeister <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cms.zms.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1193667763.6848.3.camel@peterz-desktop> |
Thanx for the hint, but wouldn't it be more consistently adding a default field for booleans in the special objekt management page in a future zms-release? Regards Peter Zechmeister, WebOffice, JKU Am Freitag, den 26.10.2007, 14:35 +0200 schrieb Dr. Frank Hoffmann: > HINT > on "if ZMS_INSERT" you can set the value by default (as JS based > interface > element) > > Regards > fh, moderator > > ---------------------------------------------------------- > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] > Im Auftrag von Peter Zechmeister > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2007 11:25 > An: ZMS-Developers > Betreff: [zms-developers] No default für boolean attributes > > Hi, > > in the special objects management dialogue there is the possibility to > set default values for some attribute types but not for boolean. > > In fact someone can negate the meaning of a boolean if necessary. > I.e. "show form" with a default of true has to be "don't show form" > with > no default. But in some cases it would be more comprehensible for > authors if there were the positive form with a default of true. > > Regards, > Peter Zechmeister, WebOffice, JKU > -- > It's struck me that the desire of people to market the RUP as the > single > process led to a result where people can do just about anything and > call > it RUP - resulting in RUP being a meaningless phrase. > (http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html) > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > -- It's struck me that the desire of people to market the RUP as the single process led to a result where people can do just about anything and call it RUP - resulting in RUP being a meaningless phrase. (http://www.martinfowler.com/articles/newMethodology.html)