AW: Re: Unique Ids?

Ad [a] this is right - the starting point depends on the document amout you
are expecting.
Different prefixes are theoretically possible, too, with ZMS 2.11 and it's
changeable model for 'standard object'. But this approach is much more
complicated (I would not recommend it).

Ad [b]
We will think about it. Your counter akquisition proposal is a good idea.

Ad [c]
Of course you can rename the objects via dtml at any time (maybe adding a
certain number); you should deactivate the automatic link correction and
change the link values of the link attributes, too.

Ad [d]
Copy/paste would work, but not cut/paste. Counter akquisition would solve
thes problem, too.

Best Regards
fh, moderator 

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Im Auftrag von Peter Zechmeister
Gesendet: Dienstag, 20. Januar 2009 16:19
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [zms-developers] Re: Unique Ids?

Thanx for the quick answer!

a) So I guess, the ranges must be big enough, that in future some node
can not 'climb' into the range of another - I.e. ZMS1 starts with
1000000, ZMS2 starts with 2000000 and so on? Or is it possible, to give
an prefix instead of the 'e'?

b) Is it possible, or why is it not possible to have one acl_sequence
whithin the top ZMS-node which also controls the ids of the subnodes?

c) What should we do with nodes which are actually existing with non
unique ids within them?

d) What if we have one sample-ZMS with a given folder-structure which is
the "master" for copy & pasting other nodes? How can we provide unique
ids here?

Regards,
PeterZ




Am Dienstag, den 20.01.2009, 14:18 +0000 schrieb Dr. Frank Hoffmann:
> In a multisite it is recommended to set individual starting numbers 
> via ../content/acl_sequence/manage to unify the ids i.e. for
> embedding. 
> 
> Best Regards
> fh, moderator
>