Re: AW: feature request: sffx in pil_img_resize

I am working with ZMS2 2.12.1-10 (Build #132e) ... eventually not the lastest build. ;)

seems as if it is moved from _fileutil.py to _pilutil.py:
http://zmslabs.org/trac/browser/ZMS/trunk/_pilutil.py#L100

maybe it would be more flexible if the sffx param could be used for custom suffixes
nevertheless - if sffx == 'none' or sffx == '' - it could default to '_thumbnail'

maybe i got it wrong anyway ?!

but when i use the following function for more than one image, like ...

pil_img_resize(getObjProperty('image_source',REQUEST),
                                (400,160),
                                mode='resize',
                                sffx='big',
                                qual=75)

pil_img_resize(getObjProperty('image_source',REQUEST),
                                (195,78),
                                mode='resize',
                                sffx='small',
                                qual=50)

then both images are named name_image_source_thumbnail.jpg

the other way it would result to:
name_image_source_big.jpg
name_image_source_small.jpg

i hope i could make the point clear enough ...

regards, Th. Weber



Am 16.04.2010 um 14:24 schrieb Dr. Frank Hoffmann:

> Hello,
> You are working with a former ZMS version?
> The API function now is placed into the pilutil module :
> http://zmslabs.org/trac/browser/ZMS/trunk/_pilutil.py 
> http://zmslabs.org/trac/changeset/918
> 
> Maybe you send us the py code for a better understanding of your proposal?
> 
> Thanks
> fh, moderator
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> Im Auftrag von Thorsten Weber
> Gesendet: Freitag, 16. April 2010 12:09
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: [zms-developers] feature request: sffx in pil_img_resize
> 
> Hello.
> 
> is it possible to change the usage of parameter 'sffx' (line 447 in
> _fileutil.pil_img_resize) for future releases?
> 
> thumb_sffx = '_thumbnail' as default is good ... but
> thumb_sffx = '_' + sffx would allow to process images with custom sffx ...
> !?
> 
> regards, Thorsten
> thorsten weber
> 
>