Re: [PATCH] Use bash for test.sh.
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.ccache |
|---|---|
| Organization | wh0rd.org |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:41:52 Eitan Adler wrote: > On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > if the script is written in bash and is intended to be, then > > /bin/bash is the correct answer. > > Absolutely false. /usr/local/bin or /opt/bin might be the correct location. if you have a crap system where bash isn't installed with /bin/bash, then you already have a ton of problems with existing software. forcing stupid behavior on everyone to cater to broken systems is wrong. -mike _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 836 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAABAgAGBQJQnzu+AAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBAeIQAJhmPuV6XTWXNjOb1P0O9kKi fveLh7+dpCnPEBmw6yXZ/UvD06gvdjPwTJ+Pd/7w++xlwM2wDJtx5YmUhOW5yscg 0Lv8ml3p5BbQYPH0MrnFLpAkBvtgwtQRpjzp9bKiBV3WSqvxlaCeed7LWX28HM3b MidNyyr0uxc4SHaWouP1QuVUxWyhWko3GGARKSAQwan643Hbv/RhyzDJFXtaUrVm r0yTXzQohSpvlEOrWZ5FWaoIBvekayRrv63GJCVfxlI07GaNo/SPc/zUFYlnKruA +Fu1QJG+EcHuxJO5pOoeA2xRyFCji/VrdOh5INFyAJcw+KP2kNrQvaOKUoQ2t4A9 XcmsnOTGyb9qdrvqb+8MQDRnto08/gBJGDkM0de6/Syi81WzUQXS8x57YK9cZfaq QhIGqbTHeDBpp2skPHBHlfiFmW6hr0S3W1iyELFACrO/hneqyrR8+rlegoX1WH0f cYc1m2l5Psem38RtGfPZd6x8GM6JUq43QBRSImbPXXQKQ6WjqHfolhO+cZo6g42v i0tGoc/5xP0X4ZCbB4S/bUkEuumtq9zgTw1PbB0xpT4lPYPxMnh3l26voslyC0u4 4TGivxaVW9oss70KbQIAAJQXB9d6u1PtbSNucATEaRZCxyD0hhwjo/YCaKCpnbs+ FT3feMx1aZKCdykif6tH =9u++ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----