Re: [PATCH] Use bash for test.sh.

On Sunday 11 November 2012 06:31:14 Eitan Adler wrote:
> On 11 November 2012 00:46, Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 November 2012 00:41:52 Eitan Adler wrote:
> >> On 10 November 2012 00:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> > if the script is written in bash and is intended to be, then
> >> > /bin/bash is the correct answer.
> >> 
> >> Absolutely false. /usr/local/bin or /opt/bin might be the correct
> >> location.
> > 
> > if you have a crap system where bash isn't installed with /bin/bash, then
> > you already have a ton of problems with existing software.  forcing
> > stupid behavior on everyone to cater to broken systems is wrong.
> 
> http://www.technollama.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/obvious-t
> roll.jpg

yes, when people tell you forcing asinine behavior is wrong, you label them 
trolls.  i guess that's how you "win" arguments.
-mike

_______________________________________________
ccache mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/Linux)
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=OTqP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----