Re: Ubuntu ccache version?
Joel Rosdahl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.ccache |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAK8D=pjycRREfe5SeTH9yGfr7BiNW3KvDZSKNDhpi-Oph4Rrhw@mail.gmail.com> |
On 10 October 2013 11:07, Andrew Stubbs <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, I've got it now: > > The git tags are on the "maint" branch in the samba.org repo, but the > "maint" branch has been merged to the "master" branch (repeatedly), so when > I clone the repo it *looks* like I'm seeing v3.1.9 plus a _bit_, but > actually it's plus a _lot_. > Right. See also the bottom part of http://ccache.samba.org/repo.html. > If Debian has -o and -p then apparently they did the same as me? It hasn't. Debian's 3.1.9-1 package is created from the released 3.1.9 source package (ccache-3.1.9.tar.bz2<http://www.samba.org/ftp/ccache/ccache-3.1.9.tar.bz2>), not the git repo. Perhaps the NEWS.txt file should say something about the extra features? > Then I would have noticed the discrepancy. Of course, it would make merging > harder. Yes, a continuously updated NEWS.txt would be good. I have been too lazy to keep it updated between releases - I have typically added the new section as part of the release process. -- Joel