Re: Using ccache with memcached

Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:48:25 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.compilers.ccache
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 02 Dec 2015 20:16, Pierre Tardy wrote:
> > i don't think getting rid out of the fs makes sense, but having memcache
> > be available dynamically as an additional layer sounds fine.
> 
> It does make a lot of sense for me as I have a high performance network,
> which is faster than local harddrive. So I would insist on keeping an
> option for memcached only.

that isn't what i meant.  i don't care about runtime config options but
about (1) the code and (2) build time control.  fs should remain in the
source and memcache should be an additional configure flag which allows
the user to select it at runtime.
-mike

_______________________________________________
ccache mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=TUNT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----