Re: Using ccache with memcached
Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> Sun, 6 Dec 2015 22:48:25 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.ccache |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 02 Dec 2015 20:16, Pierre Tardy wrote: > > i don't think getting rid out of the fs makes sense, but having memcache > > be available dynamically as an additional layer sounds fine. > > It does make a lot of sense for me as I have a high performance network, > which is faster than local harddrive. So I would insist on keeping an > option for memcached only. that isn't what i meant. i don't care about runtime config options but about (1) the code and (2) build time control. fs should remain in the source and memcache should be an additional configure flag which allows the user to select it at runtime. -mike _______________________________________________ ccache mailing list [email protected] https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/ccache
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 819 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJWZQGJAAoJEEFjO5/oN/WBoZcQAIqW3AkXNXVYwtUUYc2ZTKka k3VfVx5UnzvTQlvOeXEI/uo65o7puQKMpes9XkltonorCgmJrwkDOABMKpIojap+ IjOKO1SBoq8Y0qj2+/2CkK5KhgkztP+RRiBHOTNyQQqpYimEd5UyQu5eEKCOGM4P Ctddrsti18G8t25u5kExznyxgAgZRau6+h8dZ2ilWLeAupxQXH2a6zOv8hyjEK/H lVlHdFt85QbJ1pFjtIEhxSefgKXmhi2IF0B3Rd2m5hcrYG4uzSMMtlLxSZGalANX GCVIdR7SljQeJpiHD1CkXMxjKXmS/ubAwSOm0dp6xeFoyoGqqPRut6Kv+pUgtYkC Qnbm+b74HHDhDr4e60THXTNwlTq3Ly4CmiIwu3jGt256iqLV1o6ee5WTxYaiyRIJ OF0B6cKTy81vyEEVOezGpWmoBpw+Neg8mTYRLmhOVNyhxJQAdDgKm6MPMAlU5Dp9 XN8g2X+X/ZF0z97AcGachTGWYYbq8emYNfNbx15MLlRNfbqIRhcOR8w1cMGwraIz 4jxDHkNtlmw0XV25bSsXHAODQ9E1C5pRtkczxDJCpC8FPJPrDNPU2dayKdpMhdgc D2FgoWw0CEUYRwfnLEPOPTMJo4CHsHwep4QqLRSe0cpYJl8iCMekj2swQa0p4MyB /kEwfnxh+fz6oBtfOBKx =TUNT -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----