Re: distcc for ada (part 1 of 2)

Tim Dossett <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.compilers.distcc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Thanks for the comments.

I'll re-baseline to the current SVN; might take a week or so since this is a
spare time job for me.

Since the -x option only explicitly tells gcc what the source is supposed to
be, shouldn't distcc already support -x c, -x c++ and -x objective-c? The
reason I added code to support -x is the ada multi-language build tool
"gprbuild" by default adds -x for all languages it supports. Haven't tried
mixing the -x option with the wrong source type.

Agree that max_discrepancies_before_demotion = 10000000 (or whatever large
number) is wrong for c/c++ and ada too, but 1 seems too strict. I think 10
sounds more reasonable, allowing some remote compile failures without
reverting to non-pump compiles. It would be nice to make this user
configurable without recompiling.

Agree about the test comments; I didn't spend enough time trying to
understand the current test approach, and how to integrate with it. I'll
take another look.

Need something to distinguish protocol version 4, but personally, I think a
server version query would be preferable to another suffix on the hostname.
I didn't update the server version query response for version 4; this is a
bug.

I'll write something up in doc/protocol-4.txt for the protocol version 4
changes.

Thanks again,
Tim

__
distcc mailing list            http://distcc.samba.org/
To unsubscribe or change options:
https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.