Re: Using a weaker machine or not
Αναστασίου Γεώργιος <[email protected]> Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:49:31 +0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.distcc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <CAHkojhVcNXn5koGxER+RbHpoT6uMH+XzqNvDbkdokGU8F0NZzw@mail.gmail.com> |
So maybe there is a bottleneck between 1 core of athlon and one core of brazos(which is 5 times slower)??? Right now the problem is that i cannot improve the compiling time with the use of distcc,i am about the same of time with or without distcc. On 18 July 2012 21:44, Martin Pool <[email protected]> wrote: > The main problem is that distcc is not (last time I looked) smart > enough to understand some machines are faster than others. So if the > problem is embarrassingly parallel, you're fine, but if there is a > bottleneck the critical tasks might be stuck on slower machines. > > As an unscientific rule of thumb I would not use machines that are > more than say 2-3x (per core) slower than the average. > > -- > Martin > __ distcc mailing list http://distcc.samba.org/ To unsubscribe or change options: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/listinfo/distcc