Re: POpen en PClose

Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:57:05 +0200 (CEST)
Newsgroups gmane.comp.compilers.free-pascal.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>

On Mon, 20 Jul 2026, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal wrote:

>
> Op 20-7-2026 om 10:13 schreef Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal:
>> 
>> I am looking at the implementation of POpen and PClose in the 
>> runtime-library for Darwin (or more general for UNIX). It seems like it 
>> doesn't call into libc popen and pclose, but instead follows its own 
>> implementation in unix.pp in POpen_internal. I am just curious to know the 
>> reason.
>> 
> Phew, that was over twenty years ago, but afaik the reason is that libc popen 
> and pclose us C FILE descriptors, which the RTL in general doesn't use to 
> avoid a mix of functions with pascal and C file types.
>
> So popen/pclose are a more high level (FILE * using) part of libc, while we 
> tend to only use the basis.

Glad our memories agree on this :-)

Michael.
_______________________________________________
fpc-pascal maillist  -  [email protected]
https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal