Re: POpen en PClose
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Jul 2026 11:57:05 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.free-pascal.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 20 Jul 2026, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal wrote: > > Op 20-7-2026 om 10:13 schreef Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal: >> >> I am looking at the implementation of POpen and PClose in the >> runtime-library for Darwin (or more general for UNIX). It seems like it >> doesn't call into libc popen and pclose, but instead follows its own >> implementation in unix.pp in POpen_internal. I am just curious to know the >> reason. >> > Phew, that was over twenty years ago, but afaik the reason is that libc popen > and pclose us C FILE descriptors, which the RTL in general doesn't use to > avoid a mix of functions with pascal and C file types. > > So popen/pclose are a more high level (FILE * using) part of libc, while we > tend to only use the basis. Glad our memories agree on this :-) Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected] https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal