Re: POpen en PClose
Michael Van Canneyt via fpc-pascal <[email protected]> Mon, 20 Jul 2026 15:40:28 +0200 (CEST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.free-pascal.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, 20 Jul 2026, Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal wrote: > > > On 20/07/2026 11:40, Marco van de Voort via fpc-pascal wrote: >> >> Op 20-7-2026 om 10:13 schreef Adriaan van Os via fpc-pascal: >>> >>> I am looking at the implementation of POpen and PClose in the >>> runtime-library for Darwin (or more general for UNIX). It seems like it >>> doesn't call into libc popen and pclose, but instead follows its own >>> implementation in unix.pp in POpen_internal. I am just curious to know the >>> reason. >>> >> Phew, that was over twenty years ago, but afaik the reason is that libc >> popen and pclose us C FILE descriptors, which the RTL in general doesn't >> use to avoid a mix of functions with pascal and C file types. >> >> So popen/pclose are a more high level (FILE * using) part of libc, while we >> tend to only use the basis. > > Ah, so that means that I couldn't just call naively into libc popen with > FileRec.Handle ? Indeed you cannot do that. Michael. _______________________________________________ fpc-pascal maillist - [email protected] https://lists.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/fpc-pascal