Re: Why no schema alias?
Jay Michael <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.gpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> On 13 Aug 2012 at 10:31, Jay Michael
> wrote:
>
> > type LSTRING = STRING ;
> >
> > t3.pas:8: warning: missing string capacity -- assuming 255
> >
> > Is there some other syntax to creating an alias
> > of a schema type?
I found a "Changes List" that includes the following:
# 19980722: don't allow type y(b:integer)=array[1..b] of integer;x=y; in --extended-pascal (fjf115a.pas)
# 19980405: allow type y(b:integer)=array[1..b] of integer; x=y; (fjf115.pas)
Why was STRING singled out as not allowed to have an alias?
_______________________________________________
Gpc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.g-n-u.de/mailman/listinfo/gpc