Inverse ord

Paul Isaacs <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:02:48 -0500
Newsgroups gmane.comp.compilers.gpc
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hello Waldek,

Thanks,  I should have looked longer and more carefully.

I am retired now but spent my working years with micro/embedded 
processors. I want to keep my mind alive so I am setting forth to write 
a 10206 compliant compiler for embedded backends. Pascal should be a 
good fit for Arduino and Raspberry-Pi experimentalists. It is not as 
obscure as C and not as complex and picky as ADA.

I am currently writing a 10206 compliant parser to produce a stream of 
lexically correct terminals from Pascal source. If I ever complete the 
lexical analysis, I will move on to semantically checking the results 
and producing a stream of intermediate opcodes for a backend.

I know that I will need to feed extra information through the parser ( 
e.g. an "interrupt" directive for an interrupt procedure and "peek" and 
"poke" procedures for hardware I/O ) so I am looking for ways to do that 
and still be 10206 compliant. Thus the language lawyer interest.

Thanks for your time. Maybe someday I will be able to make a 
contribution to the contributions section of the gpc web site.

Regards,

Paul Isaacs


_______________________________________________
Gpc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.g-n-u.de/mailman/listinfo/gpc