Inverse ord
Paul Isaacs <[email protected]> Mon, 7 Mar 2016 12:02:48 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.gpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hello Waldek, Thanks, I should have looked longer and more carefully. I am retired now but spent my working years with micro/embedded processors. I want to keep my mind alive so I am setting forth to write a 10206 compliant compiler for embedded backends. Pascal should be a good fit for Arduino and Raspberry-Pi experimentalists. It is not as obscure as C and not as complex and picky as ADA. I am currently writing a 10206 compliant parser to produce a stream of lexically correct terminals from Pascal source. If I ever complete the lexical analysis, I will move on to semantically checking the results and producing a stream of intermediate opcodes for a backend. I know that I will need to feed extra information through the parser ( e.g. an "interrupt" directive for an interrupt procedure and "peek" and "poke" procedures for hardware I/O ) so I am looking for ways to do that and still be 10206 compliant. Thus the language lawyer interest. Thanks for your time. Maybe someday I will be able to make a contribution to the contributions section of the gpc web site. Regards, Paul Isaacs _______________________________________________ Gpc mailing list [email protected] https://www.g-n-u.de/mailman/listinfo/gpc