Re: 10206 lexical ambiguity

Bastiaan Veelo <[email protected]> Thu, 19 Jan 2017 19:57:11 +0100

Newsgroups	gmane.comp.compilers.gpc
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

> On 19 Jan 2017, at 19:48, Paul Isaacs <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Am I correct that, without semantic type tie-ins, that the production
> 
> new-ordinal-type          = enumerated-type
>                                      | subrange-type
>                                      ;
> 
> is ambiguous because (a) could be both an enumerated type and the expression for the lower bound of a subrange?

Where do you see the ambiguity? enumerated-type is lexically different from subrange-type.

Bastiaan.

_______________________________________________
Gpc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.g-n-u.de/mailman/listinfo/gpc

signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 842 B)