Re: 10206 lexical ambiguity
Peter <[email protected]> Mon, 23 Jan 2017 20:51:55 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.compilers.gpc |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 20/01/17 16:14, Paul Isaacs wrote: > ... > The first identifier of the > enumeration will always be undefined. Any subrange identifier must have > been defined previously. > ... Only for correct programs! A missing, or extra definition is a much more likely mistake, than getting the grammar for sub-ranges or enumerations wrong. the error messages produced this way might be a bit confusing ;-) Regards, Peter _______________________________________________ Gpc mailing list [email protected] https://www.g-n-u.de/mailman/listinfo/gpc