[Bug 1033] The duplicate ORB related classe for Jacorb 3.7 and IBM thinclient-8.5.5.7, whcih casue the our EJB accessing failed.
[email protected] Tue, 05 Jul 2016 06:03:26 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.corba.jacorb.bugs |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]/bugzilla/> |
--===============6956136742410259732== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="1467698606.7f8dAaC1.16577"; charset="UTF-8" --1467698606.7f8dAaC1.16577 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 02:03:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1033 --- Comment #3 from [email protected] --- hi, Are you able to test different versions of JacORB to narrow down the problem for me? ----- I am trying to do such testing recently, I will give feedback soon. Is there a particular reason (apart from having JacORB's stubs first) that you are putting JacORB first in the classpath? ----- As I mentioned, we cannot control it loading order for classing loading. it depends ServiceMix. Have you reported the issue to IBM to ask why their libraries need to be first in the classpath? ----- No, I haven't reported it to IBM, because I have no enough information for IBM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --1467698606.7f8dAaC1.16577 Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2016 02:03:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" <html> <head> <base href="http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/" /> </head> <body> <p> <div> <b><a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - The duplicate ORB related classe for Jacorb 3.7 and IBM thinclient-8.5.5.7, whcih casue the our EJB accessing failed." href="http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1033#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - The duplicate ORB related classe for Jacorb 3.7 and IBM thinclient-8.5.5.7, whcih casue the our EJB accessing failed." href="http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1033">bug 1033</a> from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:weifeng.f.huangfu@nokia.com" title="weifeng.f.huangfu@nokia.com">weifeng.f.huangfu@nokia.com</a> </span></b> <pre>hi, Are you able to test different versions of JacORB to narrow down the problem for me? ----- I am trying to do such testing recently, I will give feedback soon. Is there a particular reason (apart from having JacORB's stubs first) that you are putting JacORB first in the classpath? ----- As I mentioned, we cannot control it loading order for classing loading. it depends ServiceMix. Have you reported the issue to IBM to ask why their libraries need to be first in the classpath? ----- No, I haven't reported it to IBM, because I have no enough information for IBM.</pre> </div> </p> <hr> <span>You are receiving this mail because:</span> <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html> --1467698606.7f8dAaC1.16577-- --===============6956136742410259732== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ jacorb-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/mailman/listinfo/jacorb-bugs --===============6956136742410259732==--