Re: FYI - ORB classloader change in Java 7u55, Java 8u5 - Suggestions needed
Nick Cross <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.corba.jacorb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Ravindra, Given various people have differing usage scenarios it would be useful if people could upload samples showing any issues to the http://www.jacorb.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=984 ticket. Would you be able to upload such a test case? Regards Nick On 26/05/14 04:41, Ravindra Kumar wrote: > Hi, > > Did you test without the singleton class, what was the outcome, it is > pretty much interesting to have some analysis. > > thanks > ravindra > > > On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 9:13 PM, Hugo Roenick <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> On May 21, 2014, at 9:49 AM, Hugo Roenick <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Our undestanding about this notes is that now we are forced to use the >> JRE ORB as the singleton one, and can use any other ORB by using the >> ORB.init(args, props). We are about to test if not setting the >> "org.omg.CORBA.ORBSingletonClass" property and setting the >> org.omg.CORBA.ORBClass property works. >> >> Just to let you all know that ours tests worked with jacorb 3.3, 3.4 and >> 3.5-snapshot. We just need to stop setting the OBRSingletonClass property >> (for now on the ORBSingleton must be from JRE) and keep keep setting the >> ORBClass property to JacORB. >> >> Regards, >> >> -- Hugo >> >> _______________________________________________ >> jacorb-developer maillist - >> [email protected] >> https://lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/mailman/listinfo/jacorb-developer >> > _______________________________________________ > jacorb-developer maillist - [email protected] > https://lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/mailman/listinfo/jacorb-developer > _______________________________________________ jacorb-developer maillist - [email protected] https://lists.spline.inf.fu-berlin.de/mailman/listinfo/jacorb-developer