Revision control system for omniorb
Floris Bruynooghe <[email protected]> Thu, 15 Jan 2009 19:31:42 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.corba.omniorb.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Hi Duncan I did a search in the archive and didn't find a previous discussion about this so thought I'd bring it up. While I have used CVS in the long distant past I've pretty much forgotten all about it and find it really hard to use now (well, I guess there's a reason new VCSes came along). So I was wondering if you would consider changing the VCS to something more modern. cvs->svn is probably the most tested VCS migration path and subversion is also supported by sourceforge. But if you'd want to move to a DVCS that wouldn't be a bad choice either. My initial motivation for this mail is that I know the patch for CFLAGS I'm using is actually different then the one I've sent you and you said you modified the patch too. So I was trying to figure out the changes you made and compare them to see what to do next with this but it turned out to be a very painful and what seemed to me needlessly long excercise (in the end I gave up on CVS and used the snapshot but with that lost the revision info and got too many diffs). Anyway, would you be up for migrating the VCS to something newer (and friendlier)? Regards Floris -- Debian GNU/Linux -- The Power of Freedom www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org