Problem with C++ .Net

Hallo 

I need help concerning the migration from C++6.0 to C++-Net 2003. In
fact I receive exactly the same problem that I received with C++6.0
before I update the compiler flag /MLd(Debug Single-Threaded) to
/MDd(Debug Multi threaded DLL). The recent days I have tried to find a
solution by modifying the flag of the project settings of my application
under c++.Net; but I got no solution. The system goes throw the same
code sequence and I receive the same "debug failed assertion" in the
module dbgheap.c

(Using c++6.0  the Line Nr was 1044 and with C++.Net it is 1132).

I need very urgently to get my system running with C++.Net; but I need
information's about the flag to be used to solve this problem or what is
going wrong with C++.Net?

Flag status for C++6.0

/nologo /MDd /w /W0 /Gm /GR /GX /ZI /D "WIN32" /D "_DEBUG" /D "_CONSOLE"
/D "_MBCS" /Fo"Debug/" /Fd"Debug/" /FD /GZ /c

Flag status for C++6.0

/D "WIN32" /D "_DEBUG" /D "_CONSOLE" /D "_MBCS" /FD /EHsc /MDd /GR
/Fp".\Debug/eLOckDb_Cons.pch" /Fo".\Debug/" /Fd".\Debug/" /W0 /nologo /c
/ZI /Gd

 

I hope I will receive a response soon. Thanks a lot in advance

And Regards

Jean-Louis

 

________________________________

Von: Decoster Jean Louis 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 17. Januar 2006 09:33
An: [email protected]
Betreff: AW: [OB-Users] deactivation of implicit factory object?

 

Hallo 

I only want short to say that I have found the error concerning my
failure.

I have founf in the configuration file from Orbacus that Orbacus uses
the c++6.0  project option flag /MDd. My project was using the value
/MLd. I only changed that and the system runs ok.

 

I profit from this writing to ask for information concerning the use of
Orbacus 4.3 and c++ dotNet? I need try to move to c++ dotNet but I don't
know what I have exactly to do?

Are there some restrictions.  Is that easy to make the code from Orbacus
compiler running well with c++ dotNet? Thanks in advance for suggestions
and types.

Jean-Louis

 

 

________________________________

Von: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Im Auftrag von Decoster Jean Louis
Gesendet: Dienstag, 10. Januar 2006 11:56
An: David Weir
Cc: [email protected]
Betreff: [OB-Users] deactivation of implicit factory object?

 

Hello Daves

 

Thanks a lot for your recent support information's from the end of the
last year. I could use them successfully to go on developing my test
software.

At this moment the system is not working when I want to deactivate an
implicit activated factory object? I have tried all codes possibilities
found in your documentation but I always get the following failure:

 

 

HEAP[eLOckDb_Cons.exe]: Invalid Address specified to RtlValidateHeap(
003B0000, 01148508 )

 

Activation of the object:

 

::eLockidl::placeCorba_ptr         vdb_placetable::getNew() {

                        obj_Place* newPlace = new obj_Place(this);

                        return    newPlace->_this();

                        }

 

Deactivation of the object:

 

void      obj_Place::destroy() {

                                   if(id > 0) {

                                               // Use _default_POA (=
rootPOA) for deactivation as object

                                               // was created with
_this() operation

                                               //

                                               PortableServer::POA_var
poa = _default_POA();

 
PortableServer::ObjectId_var oid = poa->servant_to_id(this);

                                               poa ->
deactivate_object(oid);

                                   }

                        }

 

 

The failure comes in Template module when the statement
PortableServer::ObjectId_var oid = poa->servant_to_id(this);  has been
executed in the destroy function?

    //

    // Standard IDL to C++ Mapping

    //

    SeqVar() : ptr_(0) { }

    SeqVar(T* p) : ptr_(p) { assert_nca(p != 0, NCANullInit); }

#ifdef HAVE_VCPLUSPLUS_BUGS

    SeqVar(const SeqVar<T>& r) { ptr_ = r.ptr_ ? new T(*r.ptr_) : 0 ; }

#else

    SeqVar(const SeqVar<T>& r) : ptr_(r.ptr_ ? new T(*r.ptr_) : 0) { }

#endif

    ~SeqVar() { delete ptr_; }

 

    SeqVar<T>& operator=(T*);

    SeqVar<T>& operator=(const SeqVar<T>&);

 

 

I can't explain myself what is going wrong. I should be very pleased to
receive some suggestions about how can I solve my problem.

Thank you very much and regards

 

Jean-Louis

 

Once more have a very good and happy 2006 year - Encore une fois
meilleurs voeux pour 2006

_______________________________________________
OB-Users Mailing List - [email protected]
http://mail.ooc.nf.ca/mailman/listinfo/ob-users
Visit our support FAQ before you send a message.
http://www.orbacus.com/faq/support.html