Re: Re: webots contest
Olivier Michel <[email protected]> Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:15:11 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.cybernetics.webot.contest |
|---|---|
| Organization | Cyberbotics Ltd. |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
robotman2010 wrote:
>
>
>>>>- How noisy is the GPS measurement in the online matches? It's
>>>>perfectly accurate offline. We've started using it for some things
>>>>recently, which seem to work fine online as well. The documentation
>>>>says the the position measurements are noisy online, but I haven't seem
>>>>it seeming to affect anything in the online matches.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Actually, it is not noisy online either. We never implemented this noise
>>>for contest matches... Shall we do it before the end of the contest ?
>>>
>>>
>>Here I'd disagree with Robotman, for reasons of personal preference. We
>>have a vision system for toddler, and it works quite well. However, I
>>really have no interest in vision. For me, reliable GPS allows us to do
>>extra things that we wouldn't be able to do with just vision. Actually,
>>I would be perfectly happy to have GPS data for the opponent available
>>as well. That would allow us to do even more things that just aren't
>>reliable at all with vision.
>>
>>
>>
>
>I see your point but would like to clarify my own. The way I see it the availablity of the GPS is due to an unenforced rule. It's clear from the correspondance on the mailinglist from the time the GPS was introduced that its purpose was to enable inclinometers only, not positioning. Thus it's clear that the use of the word "noisy" regarding the GPS in the documentation implies "unusable" rather than "minor limitation to precision". This is the assumption under which we have devoloped our vision system (for our not yet submitted robot), and to allow the GPS at this moment would de facto be an arbitrary rule change undoing the tactical advantage of having such a vision system (whatever this advantage may be). Somehow it doesn't seem fair. It's true that the GPS enables far more powerful abilities but it would be on the expense of realism, but more importantly, if such a rule change takes
place it should be at the beginning of the contest, not the end.
>
>
>
Ou goal is to have a realistic robot model. Hence such a precise GPS
will disappear sooner or later (we don't plan to provide the position
information for the opponent robot, as no common real robotics device
can achieve this). I agree such a change should not occur at the end of
the contest. So, we will rather introduce it at the beginning of the new
edition of the contest.
-Olivier
------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~-->
Has someone you know been affected by illness or disease?
Network for Good is THE place to support health awareness efforts!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/RzSHvD/UOnJAA/79vVAA/pU_rlB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~->
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/webots-contest/
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/