Re: [argouml-dev] State diagram working in UML2 mode
Michiel van der Wulp <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.axion.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 09-05-11 12:58, Bob Tarling wrote: > In UML2 there is only a State metaclass for both simple state and > composite state. That state has a boolean isComposite ... > FigVertex will alter its behaviour depending on the value of > isComposite so that it can act like either of our current > FigSimpleState and FigCompositeState classes. Hi Bob, Great! Can we (later) add the functionality that you drop a state on a UML2 state with isComposite=false and have the isComposite turn to true automatically? I hope your architecture will allow that. For the end-user there will be no difference any more between simple and composite states. Ha, this is actually a good improvement in UML2 :-). Michiel ------------------------------------------------------ http://argouml.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=450&dsMessageId=2733018 To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [[email protected]]. To be allowed to post to the list contact the mailing list moderator, email: [[email protected]]