Re: comparison with cloudscape?

Here are my initial thoughts about cloudscape 10 : 
http://www.uwyn.com/blog/archives/000090.html

In the meantime I did add Derby support to RIFE BUT I had to do a 
number of workarounds for inconsistancies and bugs. The architectural 
different makes me prefer McKoi, but the license of Derby is more free. 
Haven't done much more testing with it though.

On 03 Dec 2004, at 02:57, Tobias Downer wrote:

> David,
>
> I don't have great knowledge of Cloudscape/Derby so I'll leave it up 
> to anyone who is more knowledgeable to correct me, but I believe the 
> main difference is that Mckoi is a strictly versioning database system 
> whereas Derby uses a DB2 style locking transaction model.
>
> Derby will be more comfortable with developers who are familiar with 
> DB2 and Mckoi will be more comfortable with Oracle and PostgreSQL 
> developers.
>
> Toby.
>
> David Coldrick wrote:
>> Or whatever they're calling it now :-). Becomes a reasonable question 
>> now it's been open-sourced.
>> Tobias, you could probably answer this better than anyone: what do 
>> you feel are the differences between mckoidb and cloudscape?
>> Regards,
>> David
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Mckoi SQL Database mailing list  http://www.mckoi.com/database/
> To unsubscribe, send a message to [email protected]
>
>
--
Geert Bevin                       Uwyn bvba
"Use what you need"               Avenue de Scailmont 34
http://www.uwyn.com               7170 Manage
gbevin[remove] at uwyn dot com    Tel +32 64 84 80 03

PGP Fingerprint : 4E21 6399 CD9E A384 6619  719A C8F4 D40D 309F D6A9
Public PGP key  : available at servers pgp.mit.edu, wwwkeys.pgp.net



---------------------------------------------------------------
Mckoi SQL Database mailing list  http://www.mckoi.com/database/
To unsubscribe, send a message to [email protected]