Re: Metakit and C#?

(I thought the previous person meant C# rather than C++... I figured it was
a typo)

So... define "straightforward"?  IME, there needs to be a wrapper of some
kind, even if it is a fairly one-to-one wrapper...  I thought that's what
Mr. Kelley was talking about.  SWIG is just a way to generate native
wrappers for different languages.  I've never done SWIG with C#, but if it
works with C# then it's a very easy way to generated a nice clean wrapper.

I guess clarification from Mr. Kelley on what exactly he has done would help
on this.


On 6/1/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
> I'm a little puzzled by the characterization of C++ in this context as a
> "secondary language".  I thought that Metakit was implemented in C++, which
> would make that the *primary* language.   ???
>
> Beyond that, my understanding (from a local expert) is that it is
> straightforward to call routines in other languages from C# (he says that
> his application calls a number of C++ and even Fortran modules).  So what I
> was wondering is whether anyone has experience doing this with Metakit.
>
> ------------------------------
> Gary H. Merrill, Principal Scientist
> Analysis Applications, Research, and Technologies
> GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development
> Research Triangle Park, NC
> 919.483.8456
>
>
>  *"Brian Kelley" <[email protected]>*
> Sent by: [email protected]
>
> 31-May-2006 16:12
>           To
> "[email protected]" <[email protected]>  cc
> [email protected]  Subject
> Re: [Metakit] Metakit and C#?
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I have slowly been making a swig wrapper for metakit to help for
> secondary languages, java, c++, python.
>
> It is at the point where it is almost useable ( I can make databases
> and add rows and such ) but it has not been well tested and is
> certainly not incredibly complete nor as easy to use as the current
> python interface.  It pretty much is a direct copy of the C++
> interface.
>
> I'll be happy to upload this somewhere so people can begin playing
> with it, it is highly in-progress though, mainly an issue of how much
> time I have.
>
> Brian Kelley
>
> On 5/31/06, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > We are about to move to C# for interface and application development
> (with a
> > lot of back end stuff in other languages).  Does anyone have experience
> in
> > using Metakit with C#?  Any hints or suggestions?
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >  Gary H. Merrill, Principal Scientist
> >  Analysis Applications, Research, and Technologies
> >  GlaxoSmithKline Research and Development
> >  Research Triangle Park, NC
> >  919.483.8456
> > _____________________________________________
> > Metakit mailing list  -  [email protected]
> > http://www.equi4.com/mailman/listinfo/metakit
> >
> >
> >
> _____________________________________________
> Metakit mailing list  -  [email protected]
> http://www.equi4.com/mailman/listinfo/metakit
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________
> Metakit mailing list  -  [email protected]
> http://www.equi4.com/mailman/listinfo/metakit
>
>
>

_____________________________________________
Metakit mailing list  -  [email protected]
http://www.equi4.com/mailman/listinfo/metakit