Re: Why SHA256+salt authentication ?

Kristofer Pettersson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.db.mysql.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Sergei Golubchik skrev 2011-05-27 11:24:
> Just curious, why do you guys want new authentication plugin
> that uses sha256 and salt?

It is important to realize that this code is just a prototype on
something which we're discussing. The immediate plans for this in future
releases are not settled nor guaranteed. But from a pure technical stand
point I think it is important to invite more people to discussion in the
spirit of open source.

So why make a prototype? There is a driving demand to leave SHA-1 based
algorithms behind and start using SHA-2 based algorithms. There is a
proof of concept on attacking SHA-1 which are a year or two old, but I
haven't found anything similar to an exploit though. On the other hand,
it is important to be ahead of the game in the land of cryptography.

> 
> Was the current (double SHA2) security found flawed?

There is no evidence that it is flawed and there is no evidence of
successful cryptographic attacks.

> Or you just like it salted?

Yes. It is suppose to make it more difficult to construct MySQL specific
rainbow tables.

> 
> Or (conspiracy theory) it's a way to prevent open source MySQL clients
> (or servers) to talk to commercial MySQL servers (or clients)?
> No, it doesn't look like it.
> 

Nope. We both want everyone to use MySQL, even paranoid governments with
a cryptographic fetish, wouldn't you agree? :)

Regards,
Kristofer

-- 
MySQL Internals Mailing List
For list archives: http://lists.mysql.com/internals
To unsubscribe:    http://lists.mysql.com/[email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.