Re: need help from the list admin
Reindl Harald <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.db.mysql.general |
|---|---|
| Organization | the lounge interactive design |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Am 30.03.2016 um 18:56 schrieb Lentes, Bernd: > ----- On Mar 28, 2016, at 9:53 PM, shawn l.green [email protected] wrote: >>> I read that the converting is not difficult. But has the code of our webapp to >>> be changed ? It's written in php and perl. >>> What i understand is that inserts/updates/deletions in InnoDB tables have to be >>> commited. Yes ? >> >> No. The server's default is to have --autocommit=1, which means that >> there is an implicit commit at the end of every command. You do not need >> to state explicitly "COMMIT" every time you want this to happen. >> >> In fact, disabling autocommit has gotten many new users into trouble >> because they did not understand the behavior they changed. > > So i should use the default (autocommit=1)? no, you should what is appropriate for your application if you don't care about inserts/updates triggered by let say a webrequest are half written due a crash or restart use autocommit if you care that all or nothing is written use transactions if you care that way don't mix non-transactional tables with innodb
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 181 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAlb8ByYACgkQhmBjz394Anm0NQCfdrRLX4LI6FTR5ahdxCF7Uo+C QscAn0NnQidrWNKig4J9U7f6xd0Q+3hF =wEC7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----